This bulletin
has been prepared especially for clients of A. N. Deringer, Inc. by:
SERKO
SIMON GLUCK & KANE LLP – Customs & International Trade Law
December 7, 2006
CUSTOMS and BORDER PROTECTION
(CBP)
Foundation Undergarments – Certain undergarments made of lace cups, front and side panels extending
below the waist and covering the upper abdomen, are constructed of 91% nylon
and 9% lightweight elastane net and lace fabrics and were classified as “corsets”
under subheading 6212.30.0020 (23.5% duty, cat. 649), HTSUS. Although the garments cover the torso and
upper abdomen, it is not designed to “cinch, reshape, or mold”, thus, they can
not be classified as corsets; the proper classification is under subheading
6212.90.0030 (6.6% duty; cat. 659), HTSUS, the provision for “Brassieres,
girdles, corsets…: Other.”
TRADE TALK
Butt-weld
Pipe Fittings – Decided to keep in place the AD order on certain stainless steel
butt-weld pipe fittings from
Steel
Flat Products – Decided to conduct a sunset review of its AD order on
certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat products from
Steel
Concrete Reinforcing Bars – Decided to conduct a sunset review on
its AD order on certain steel
concrete reinforcing bars from
Computer
Switches – Certain
computer peripheral switches and products containing same which allow the operation of multiple computers from one
console.
Digital
Multimeters – Certain handheld devices that measure and display
electrical parameters, such as voltage and resistance.
BUSINESS
BRIEFS
·
Export Administration Regulations:
Electronic Communications – Effective November 20, 2006, the U.S. Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) added devices
used in intercepting wire, oral, or electronic communications
to the list of goods subject to export controls.
Review of
·
Miscellaneous Developments:
Another DRAM Price Fixing Conviction – The U.S. Department of Justice recently announced another conviction of a
Japanese executive involved in the price fixing of dynamic random access memory
semiconductors (DRAMS). The executive
also agreed to pay a $250,000 fine, bringing the total monies recovered in the
case to $731 million.
Acid-Washed Denim – Imports of certain acid washed denim garments and accessories, which
until now required documentary evidence of non-infringement with the “213 Patent”,
may now be imported without restriction, as the patent covering the washing process
has expired.
Asthma Friendly Products – Many common household articles, including toys, are known to trigger asthma and allergy
attacks. With the prevalent rates for
asthma and allergies among children doubling in the past 20 years, the Asthma
and Allergy Foundation of America (AAFA) instituted a new program to certify
toys as “asthma friendly.” Toys which have been scientifically tested
and proven to be better choices for suffering children have been certified as
“asthma friendly.” Other household
products, such as pillows, mattresses, pillow covers, vacuum cleaners, and
flooring, are in various stages of testing.
Biotech Presence in Apparel Industry – Genetically engineered crops are increasingly finding their way into the
apparel industry. The latest use of
biotech products are those using biodegradable fabrics and apparel made of a
new fiber called Ingeo™. Biodegradable
corn-based disposable diapers, already sold in Europe, will soon be introduced
into the
COURT CASES
·
Failure to Follow Classification Ruling: In U.S.
v. Rockwell Automation, Inc., the U.S. Court of International Trade (CIT)
ordered the defendant to stand trial for making material false statements and
omissions on its entry documents. Because
the defendant entered its merchandise using a classification other than that it
received from CBP in a pre-entry classification ruling, it essentially made a
“false” statement under CBP rules and regulations. It also failed to mention the
pre-classification ruling in the entry documents as required under the
regulations.
·
Luxury
Purveyor Sues Mass Retailer:
A leading luxury handbag maker recently sued one of the nation’s leading
mass retailers for $1 million for allegedly selling what it believes is a
counterfeit copy of their bag. This suit
follows a similar one filed a few months ago by another handbag manufacturer
against another mass retailer for allegedly selling knockoffs of its
handbags. In the earlier case, the plaintiff
argued that as it does not have any merchandising agreement with the retailer
or anyone affiliated with it, it is more than likely that the bargain selling
price of its expensive bags must be for counterfeits.
Serko Simon
Gluck & Kane LLP
1700 Broadway, 31st Floor
Phone (212) 775-005 Fax (212) 839-9103
Outside of
E-mail address: serko-simon@customs-law.com On the
internet at: www.customs-law.com
Note: This
information is current as of the date of this document, and is not, nor is it
intended to be, legal advice, which can only be provided by Serko Simon Gluck
&Kane LLP on a case-by-case basis. ©2006